Crime, Parole, and Justice: NY Post Letters

NY Post letters discuss crime, parole issues, and justice system concerns related to cases like the Olton murder and parole infractions. Focus on repeat offenders and legal rights.

It is unsubstantiated that a coward who apparently shot a chief executive officer in the back since he disagreed with him had his fees decreased– and is admired because he resembles a motion picture star (“It Certain Was Terrorism,” Content, Sept. 17).

Want to weigh in on today’s tales? Send your ideas (in addition to your full name and city of residence) to letters@nypost.com. Letters are subject to editing and enhancing for quality, style, size, and precision.

Parole Infractions and Re-offending

Never mind Jamel McGriff not being picked up for a parole infraction last November; take into consideration the fact that he would certainly still be in prison if he had offered his full time for previous criminal offenses he committed, and therefore unable to prey upon Maureen and Frank Thomas Olton (“Just How Dems Made Parole a Joke,” Editorial, Sept. 15).

Safeguarding Legal Rights in Court

Relating to the far a lot of cases comparable to the Olton couple’s murder, it interests note that despite the majority of deviants having long rap sheets, there’s little to no activity taken by authorities to maintain them from reoffending.

While undoubtedly the district lawyer’s task is to encourage the jury, the judge is still there to safeguard the legal rights of even the similarity Mangione and need to not enable charges with no basis actually to be levied against an accused.